Skip to main content

Full text of "Harvard classics"

See other formats

Digitized by the Internet Archive 
in 2010 














►v 5 





. <-> 














• , 



■ ■ i: Y^vfc 

















Copyright, 1910 
By P. F. Collier & Son 




The Prince . . .... . Niccolo Machiavelli 

translated by n. h. thomson 


I, Of the Various Kinds of Princedom, and of the 

Ways In Which They Are Acquired .... 7 
II. Of Hereditary Princedoms 7 

III. Of Mixed Princedoms ' 8 

IV. Why the Kingdom of Darius, Conquered by Alex- 

ander, Did Not, on Alexander's Death, Rebel 

Against His Successors 16 

V. How Cities or Provinces Which Before Their Ac- 
quisition Have Lived Under Their Own Laws 

Are To Be Governed 18 

VI. Of New Princedoms Which a Prince Acquires With 

His Own Arms and by Merit 20 

VII. Of New Princedoms Acquired By the Aid of Others 

and By Good Fortune 2$ 

VIII. Of Those Who By Their Crimes Come to Be 

Princes 30 

IX. Of the Civil Princedom . . • 34 

X. How the Strength of All Princedoms Should Be 

Measured 37 

XL Of Ecclesiastical Princedoms 39 

XII. How Many Different Kinds of Soldiers There Are, 

and of Mercenaries 42 

XIII. Of Auxiliary, Mixed, and National Arms ... 47 

XIV. Of the Duty of a Prince In Respect of Military 

Affairs 50 

XV. Of the Qualities In Respect of Which Men, and 

Most of all Princes, Are Praised or Blamed . 53 
XVI. Of Liberality and Miserliness .. .. ,. M . ... ... S4 

HC— Vol. 36 I (A), 



XVII. Of Cruelty and Clemency, and Whether It Is Better 

To Be Loved or Feared 56 

XVIII. How Princes Should Keep Faith 59 

XIX. That a Prince Should Seek to Escape Contempt and 

Hatred 62 

XX. Whether Fortresses, and Certain Other Expedients 
to Which Princes Often Have Recourse, are 

Profitable or Hurtful 71 

XXI. How a Prince Should Bear Himself So As to 

Acquire Reputation 75 

XXII. Of the Secretaries of Princes 79 

XXIII. That Flatterers Should Be Shunned ..... 80 

XXIV. Why the Princes of Italy Have Lost Their States 82 
XXV. What Fortune Can Effect in Human Affairs, and 

How She May Be Withstood 83 

XXVI. An Exhortation to Liberate Italy from the Bar- 
barians 86 

The Life of Sir Thomas More . . . William Roper 93 

Utopia Sir Thomas More 143 

translated by ralph robinson 

The Ninety-five Theses Martin Luther 265 

translated by r. s. grignon 

Address to the Christian Nobility of the German 
Nation Respecting the Reformation of the Chris- 
tian Estate ........ Martin Luther 276 

translated by c. a. buck h el m 

Concerning Christian Liberty . . Martin Luther 353 
translated by r. s. grignon 


Niccolo Machiavelli, one of the most brilliant and versatile 
intellects of the Italian Renaissance, was born at Florence, May 
3, 1469. He entered the public service as a young man, and be- 
tween 1500 and 1512 he was employed in a number of diplomatic 
missions to the other Italian cities, to France, and to Germany, 
When the Medici returned to power in Florence in 1512, Machia- 
velli lost his positions, and suffered imprisonment and torture. 
On his release in the following year, he retired to the country and 
devoted himself to study and the composition of his most famous 
work, "The Prince." Other zvritings followed; and in the last 
year of his life we find him again in active life, this time as a 
soldier. He died June 21, 1527. 

A more detailed account of Machiavelli, by Lord Macaulay, will 
be found in the volume of "English Essays" in the Harvard 

Machiavelli 's aim in " The Prince " has been very variously in- 
terpreted. His motive was probably mainly patriotic; but the 
exclusion of moral considerations in his treatment of politics led, 
even in his own century, to his name's becoming a synonym for 
all that is diabolical in public and private policy. Whatever may 
be the relation of the methods expounded in " The Prince" to his 
personal ideals, the book remains a most vivid and suggestive 
picture of political conditions in the Italy of the Renaissance. 

Machiavelli } s " Discourses on Livy's Decades " deals on a larger 
scale with many of the topics of "The Prince"; his "Art of 
War" elaborates his views on the military side; and his "History 
of Florence," his "Life of Castruccio Castracani," and his 
comedy, " Mandragola," are characteristic products of an accom- 
plished man of letters who one time was diplomat and soldier, at 
another historian, poet, and dramatist. Few men represent so 
thoroughly the extraordinary versatility of that wonderful age. 

"Of all Machiavelli' s writings" says Gamett, "'The Prince 3 
is the most famous, and deservedly, for it is the most character- 
istic. Few subjects of literary discussion have occasioned more 
controversy than the purpose of this celebrated book. Some 
have beheld in it a manual for tyrants, like the memoirs of 
Tiberius, so diligently perused by Domiiian; others have re" 


garded it as a refined irony upon tyranny, on the sarcastic plan 
of Swiff s Directions to Servants, if so humble an analogy be 
permissible. From various points of view it might alternately 
pass for either, but its purpose is accurately conveyed by neither 
interpretation. Machiavelli was a sincere though too supple a 
republican, and by no means desired the universal prevalence of 
tyranny throughout Italy. . . . His aim probably was to 
show how to build up a principality capable of expelling the 
foreigner and restoring the independence of Italy. But this 
intention could not be safely expressed, and hence his work 
seems repulsive, because the reason of state which he propounds 
as an apology for infringing the moral code appears not pa- 
triotic, but purely selfish. . . . With all his faults and 
oversights, nothing can deprive Machiavelli of the glory of hav- 
ing been the modern Aristotle in politics, the first, or at least the 
first considerable writer who derived a practical philosophy 
from history, and exalted statecraft into science." 


Disputation of Dr. Martin Luther Concerning 
Penitence and Indulgences 

IN the desire and with the purpose of elucidating the 
truth, a disputation will be held on the underwritten 
propositions at Wittemberg, under the presidency of 
the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Monk of the Order of 
St. Augustine, Master of Arts and of Sacred Theology, and 
ordinary Reader of the same in that place. He therefore 
asks those who cannot be present and discuss the subject 
with us orally, to do so by letter in their absence. In the 
name of our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen. 

1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, in saying " Repent 
ye," 1 etc., intended that the whole life of believers should 
be penitence. 

2. This word cannot be understood of sacramental pen- 
ance, that is, of the confession and satisfaction which are 
performed under the ministry of priests. 

3. It does, not, however, refer solely to inward penitence; 
nay such inward penitence is naught, unless it outwardly 
produces various mortifications of the flesh. 

4. The penalty 2 thus continues as long as the hatred of 
self — that is, true inward penitence — continues: namely, till 
our entrance into the kingdom of heaven. 

5. The Pope has neither the will nor the power to remit 
any penalties, except those which he has imposed by his own 
authority, or by that of the canons. 

6. The Pope has no power to remit any guilt, except by 

1 In the Lathi, from the Vulgate, " agite p&niteniiam," sometimes trans- 
lated " Do penance." The effect of the following theses depends to some 
extent on the double meaning of " pcenitentia " — penitence and penance. 

2 I. e. "Pcefia," the connection between " pcena " and " pcenitentia " being 
again suggestive. 



declaring and warranting it to have been remitted by God; 
or at most by remitting cases reserved for himself ; in which 
cases, if his power were despised, guilt would certainly re- 

7. God never remits any man's guilt, without at the same 
time subjecting him, humbled in all things, to the authority 
of his representative the priest. 

8. The penitential canons are imposed only on the living; 
and no burden ought to be imposed on the dying, according 
to them. 

9. Hence the Holy Spirit acting in the Pope does well 
for us, in that, in his decrees, he always makes exception of 
the article of death and of necessity. 

10. Those priests act wrongly and unlearnedly, who, in 
the case of the dying, reserve the canonical penances for 

11. Those tares about changing of the canonical penalty 
into the penalty of purgatory seem surely to have been 
sown while the bishops were asleep. 

12. Formerly the canonical penalties were imposed not 
after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition. 

13. The dying pay all penalties by death, and are already 
dead to the canon laws, and are by right relieved from 

14. The imperfect soundness or charity of a dying person 
necessarily brings with it great fear; and the less it is, the 
greater the fear it brings. 

15. This fear and horror is sufficient by itself, to say 
nothing of other things, to constitute the pains of purgatory, 
since it is very near to the horror of despair. 

16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven appear to differ as de- 
spair, almost despair, and peace of mind differ. 

17. With souls in purgatory it seems that it must needs 
be that, as horror diminishes, so charity increases. 

18. Nor does it seem to be proved by any reasoning or 
any scriptures, that they are outside of the State of merit 
or of the increase of charity. 

19. Nor does this appear to be proved, that they are sure 
and confident of their own blessedness, at least all of them* 
though we may be very sure of it. 


20. Therefore the Pope, when he speaks of the plenary 
remission of all penalties, does not mean simply of all, but 
only of those imposed by himself. 

21. Thus those preachers of indulgences are in error who 
say that, by the indulgences of the Pope, a man is loosed 
and saved from all punishment. 

22. For in fact he remits to souls in purgatory no penalty 
which they would have had to pay in this life according to 
the canons. 

23. If any entire remission of all penalties can be granted 
to any one, it is certain that it is granted to none but the 
most perfect — that is, to very few. 

24. Hence the greater part of the people must needs be 
deceived by this indiscriminate and high-sounding promise 
pf release from penalties. 

25. Such power as the Pope has over purgatory in gen- 
eral, such has every bishop in his own diocese, and every 
curate in his own parish, in particular. 

26. The Pope acts most rightly in granting remission to 
souls, not by the power of the keys (which is. of no avail in 
this case), but by the way of suffrage. 

2j. They preach man, who say that the soul flies out of 
purgatory as soon as the money thrown into the chest 

28. It is certain that, when the money rattles in the chest, 
avarice and gain may be increased, but the suffrage of the 
Church depends on the will of God alone. 

29. Who knows whether all the souls in purgatory desire 
to be redeemed from it, according to the story told of Saints 
Severinus and Paschal? 

30. No man is sure of the reality of his own contrition, 
much less of the attainment of plenary remission. 

31. Rare as is a true penitent, so rare is one who truly 
buys indulgences — that is to say, most rare. 

32. Those who believe that, through letters of pardon, 
they are made sure of their own salvation, will be eternally 
damned along with their teachers. 

33. We must especially beware of those who say that 
these pardons from the Pope are that inestimable gift of 
God by which man is reconciled to Go& 


34. For the grace conveyed by these pardons has respect 
only to the penalties of sacramental satisfaction, which are 
of human appointment. 

35. They preach no Christian doctrine, who teach that 
contrition is not necessary for those who buy souls out of 
purgatory or buy confessional licences. 

36. Every Christian who feels true compunction has of 
right plenary remission of pain and guilt, even without 
letters of pardon. 

37. Every true Christian, whether living or dead, has a 
share in all the benefits of Christ and of the Church given 
him by God, even without letters of pardon. 

38. The remission, however, imparted by the Pope is by 
no means to be despised, since it is, as I have said, a declara- 
tion of the Divine remission. 

39. It is a most difficult thing, even for the most learned 
theologians, to exalt at the same time in the eyes of the 
people the ample effect of pardons and the necessity of true 

40. True contrition seeks and loves punishment; while the 
ampleness of pardons relaxes it, and causes men to hate it, or 
at least gives occasion for them to do so. 

41. Apostolical pardons ought to be proclaimed with cau- 
tion, lest the people should falsely suppose that they: are 
placed before other good works of charity. 

42. Christians should be taught that it is not the mind of 
the Pope tMat the buying of pardons is to be in any way 
compared to works of mercy. 

43. Christians should be taught that he who gives to a 
poor man, or lends to a needy man, does better than if he 
bought pardons. 

44. Because, by a work of charity, charity increases and 
the man becomes better; while, by means of pardons, he 
does not become better, but only freer from punishment. 

45. Christians should be taught that he who seeg any one 
in need, and passing him by, gives money for pardons, is 
not purchasing for himself the indulgences of the Pope, 
but the anger of God. 

46. Christians should be taught that, unless they have 
superfluous wealth, they are bound to keep what is necessary 


for the use of their own households, and by no means to 
lavish it on pardons. 

47. Christians should be taught that, while they are free 
to buy pardons, they are not commanded to do so. 

48. Christians should be taught that the Pope, in granting 
pardons, has both more need and more desire that devout 
prayer should be made for him, than that money should be 
readily paid. 

49. Christians should be taught that the Pope's pardons 
are useful, if they do not put their trust in them; but most 
hurtful, if through them they lose the fear of God. 

50. Christians should be taught that, if the Pope were 
acquainted with the exactions of the preachers of pardons, 
he would prefer that the Basilica of St. Peter should be 
burnt to ashes, than that it should be built up with the skin, 
flesh and bones of his sheep. 

51. Christians should be taught that, as it would be the 
duty, so it would be the wish of the Pope, even to sell, if 
necessary, the Basilica of St. Peter, and to give of his own 
money to very many of those from whom the preachers of 
pardons extract money. 

52. Vain is the hope of salvation through letters of par- 
don, even if a commissary — nay, the Pope himself — were 
to pledge his own soul for them. 

53. They are enemies of Christ and of the Pope who, in 
order that pardons may be preached, condemn the word of 
God to utter silence in other churches. 

54. Wrong is done to the word of God when, in the same 
sermon, an equal or longer time is spent on pardons than 
on it. 

55. The mind of the Pope necessarily is, that if pardons, 
which are a very small matter, are celebrated with single 
bells, single processions, and single ceremonies, the Gospel, 
which is a very great matter, should be preached with a 
hundred bells, a hundred processions, and a hundred cere- 

56. The treasures of the Church, whence the Pope grants 
indulgences, are neither sufficiently named nor known among 
the people of Christ. 

57. Ife is clear that they are at least not temporal treas- 


ures, for these are not so readily lavished, but only accumu- 
lated, by many of the preachers. 

58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and of the saints, 
for these, independently of the Pope, are always working 
grace to the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell to the 
outer man. 

59. St. Lawrence said that the treasures of the Church 
are the poor of the Church, but he spoke according to the 
use of the word in his time. 

60. We are not speaking rashly when we say that the 
keys of the Church, bestowed through the merits of Christ, 
are that treasure. 

61. For it is clear that the power of the Pope is alone suf- 
ficient for the remission of penalties and of reserved cases. 

62. The true treasure of the Church is the Holy Gospel 
of the glory and grace of God. 

6$. This treasure, however, is deservedly most hateful, 
because it makes the first to be last. 

64. While the treasure of indulgences is deservedly most 
acceptable, because it makes the last to be first. 

65. Hence the treasures of the gospel are nets, wherewith 
of old they fished for the men of riches. 

66. The treasures of indulgences are nets, wherewith they 
now fish for the riches of men. 

67. Those indulgences, which the preachers loudly pro- 
claim to be the greatest graces, are seen to be truly such as 
regards the promotion of gain. 

68. Yet they are in reality in no degree to be compared to 
the grace of God and the piety of the cross. 

69. Bishops and curates are bound to . receive the com- 
missaries of apostolical pardons with all reverence. 

70. But they are still more bound to see to it with all 
their eyes, and take heed with all their ears, that these 
men do not preach their own dreams in place of the Pope's 

71. He who speaks against the truth o£ apostolical par- 
dons, let him be anathema and accursed. 

J2. But he, on the other hand, who exerts himself against 
the wantonness and licence of speech of &e preachers of 
pardons, let him be blessed. 


72, As the Pope justly thunders against those who use 
any kind of contrivance to the injury of the traffic in par- 

74. Much more is it his intention to thunder against those 
who, under the pretext of pardons, use contrivances to the 
injury of holy charity and of truth. 

75. To think that Papal pardons have such power that 
they could absolve a man even if — by an impossibility — 
he had violated the Mother of God, is madness. 

j6. We affirm, on the contrary, that Papal pardons cannot 
take away even the least of venal sins, as regards its guilt. 

77* The saying that, even if St. Peter were now Pope, 
he could grant no greater graces, is blasphemy against St. 
Peter and the Pope. 

78. We affirm, on the contrary, that both he and any other 
Pope have greater graces to grant — namely, the Gospel, 
powers, gifts of healing, etc. (1 Cor. xii. 9.) 

79. To say that the cross set up among the insignia of 
the Papal arms is of equal power with the cross of Christ, 
is blasphemy. 

80. Those bishops, curates, and theologians who allow 
such discourses to have currency among the people, will 
have to render an account. 

81. This licence in the preaching of pardons makes it no 
easy thing, even for learned men, to protect the reverence 
due to the Pope against the calumnies, or, at all events, the 
keen questionings of the laity. 

82. As for instance : — Why does not the Pope empty 
purgatory for the sake of most holy charity and of the 
supreme necessity of souls — this being the most just of all 
reasons — if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the 
sake of that most fatal thing, money, to be spent On build- 
ing a basilica — this being a very slight reason? 

83. Again : why do funeral masses and anniversary masses 
for the deceased continue, and why does not the Pope re- 
turn, or permit the withdrawal of the funds bequeathed for 
this purpose, since it is a wrong to pray for those who are 
already redeemed ? 

84. Again : what is this new kindness of God and the Pope, 
in that, for money's sake, they permit an impious man and 


an enemy of God to redeem a pious soul which loves God, 
and yet do not redeem that same pious and beloved soul, 
out of free charity, on account of its own need? 

85. Again : why is it that the penitential canons, long since 
abrogated and dead in themselves in very fact and not only 
by usage, are yet still redeemed with money, through the 
granting of indulgences, as if they were full of life, 

86. Again : why does not the Pope, whose riches are at 
this day more ample than those of the wealthiest of the 
wealthy, build the one Basilica of St. Peter with his own 
money, rather than with that of poor believers? 

87. Again: what does the Pope remit or impart to those 
who, through perfect contrition, have a right to plenary re- 
mission and participation? 

88. Again: what greater good would the Church receive 
if the Pope, instead of once, as he does now, were to bestow 
these remissions and participations a hundred times a day 
on any one of the faithful? 

89. Since it is the salvation of souls, rather than money, 
that the Pope seeks by his pardons, why does he suspend the 
letters and pardons granted long ago, since they are equally 
efficacious ? 

90. To repress these scruples and arguments of the lait} 
by force alone, and not to solve them by giving reasons, is 
to expose the Church and the Pope to the ridicule of their 
enemies, and to make Christian men unhappy. 

91* If, then, pardons were preached according to the 
spirit and mind of the Pope, all these questions would be 
resolved with ease — nay, would not exist. 

92* Away, then, with all those prophets who say to the 
people of Christ, " Peace, peace," and there is no peace ! 

93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to the people of 
Christ, " The cross, the cross," and there is no cross ! 

94. Christians should be exhorted to strive to follow 
Christ their Head through pains, deaths, and hells, 

95. And thus trust to enter heaven through many; tribu« 
lations, rather than in the security of peace. 



I, Martin Luther, Doctor, of the Order of Monks at 
Wittenberg, desire to testify publicly that certain proposi- 
tions against pontifical indulgences, as they call them, have 
been put forth by me. Now although, up to the present 
time, neither this most celebrated and renowned school of 
ours, nor any civil or ecclesiastical power has condemned me, 
ytt there are, as I hear, some men of headlong and audacious 
spirit, who dare to pronounce me a heretic, as though the 
matter had been thoroughly looked into and studied. But 
on my part, as I have often done before, so now too, I im- 
plore all men, by the faith of Christ, either to point out to 
me a better way, if such a way has been divinely revealed 
to any, or at least to submit their opinion to the judgment 
of God and of the Church. For I am neither so rash as to 
wish that my sole opinion should be preferred to that of all 
other men, nor so senseless as to be willing that the word 
of God should be made to give place to fables, devised by 
human reason. 


To the respected and worthy Nicolaus von Amsdorff s 
Licentiate in the Holy Scriptures and Canon of Wittenberg? 
my particular and affectionate friend. 

Dr. Martinus Luther. 

The grace and peace of God be with you, respected, worthy 
Sir, and dear friend ! 

The time for silence is gone, and the time to speak has come, 
as we read in Ecclesiastes (iii. 7). I have, in conformity with 
our resolve, put together some few points concerning the reforma- 
tion of the Christian estate, with the intent of placing the same 
before the Christian nobility of the German nation, in case it may 
please God to help His Church by means of the laity, inasmuch 
as the clergy, whom this task rather befitted, have become quite 
careless. I send all this to your worships to judge and to amend 
where needed. I am well aware that I shall not escape the re- 
proach of taking far too much upon me in presuming, insignificant 
and forsaken as I am, to address such high estates on such 
weighty and great subjects, as if there were no one in the world 
but Dr. Luther to have a care for Christianity and to give advice 
to such wise people. 

Let who will blame me, I shall not offer any excuse. Perhaps 
I still owe God and the world another folly. This debt I have 
now resolved honestly to discharge, as well as may be, and to be 
Court fool for once in my life ; if I fail, I shall at any rate gain 
this advantage: that no one need buy me a fool's cap or shave 
my poll. But it remains to be seen which shall hang the bells on 
the other. I must fulfil the proverb, "When anything is to be 
done in the world, a monk must be in it, were it only as a 
painted figure." I suppose it has often happened that a fool 
has spoken wisely, and wise men have often done foolishly, as 
St. Paul says, "If any man among you seemeth to be wise in 

1 Nicolaus von AmsdorfE (1483-1565) was a colleague of Luther at the 
university of Wittenberg, _ and one of his most zealous fellow-workers aa 
the cause of the Reformation. 



this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise" (i Cor. 
iii. 18). 

Now, inasmuch as I am not only a fool, but also a sworn 
doctor of the Holy Scriptures, I am glad that I have an oppor- 
tunity of fulfilling my oath, just in this fool's way. I beg you 
to excuse me to the moderately wise, for I know not how to 
deserve the favour and grace of the supremely wise, which I 
have so often sought with much labour, but now for the future 
shall neither have nor regard. 
God help us to seek not our glory, but His alone. Amen. 

Wittenberg, in the monastry of St. Augustine, on the eve 

of Si. John the Baptist in the year 1520. 


Planned and Designed 
at The Collier Press 
By William Patten 



3 9031 026 12392 7